Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Davison v. Whitten
as 22-5080
Petitioner / Appellant: ALONZO G. DAVISON
Respondent / Appellee: RICK WHITTEN
Dunn v. Crow, et al
as 22-6142
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL R. DUNN
Respondent / Appellee: SCOTT CROW, Director and RICK WHITTEN, Warden
Thompson v. Whitten
as 22-5067
Petitioner / Appellant: GARRICK DON THOMPSON
Respondent / Appellee: RICK WHITTEN
Whitten v. Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00275
Plaintiff: Dennis Whitten
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lester v. Whitten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00676
Plaintiff: Derrick Lamar Lester
Defendant: Rick Whitten, Ms. V Howes, Mrs. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Revilla v. Whitten We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00658
Petitioner: Andrew J Revilla
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Whitten
as 6:2022cv00241
Petitioner: Derrick L. Lester
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00307
Petitioner: Glendell Dewayne Lee
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lester v. Whitten et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00219
Plaintiff: Derrick Lamar Lester
Defendant: Rick Whitten, Ms. V Howes, Mrs. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitten v. Williams, et al
as 22-1180
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES WHITTEN
Respondent / Appellee: DEAN WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?