Cases 21 - 30 of 92
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2021cv00245
Defendant:
Santa Fe Police Department, Nick Wood, Isodoro Vigil and others
Plaintiff:
Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Ruyle v. City of Santa Fe et al
as 1:2021cv00246
Defendant:
Santa Fe Police Department, Officer Nick Wood, Isodoro Vigil and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ruyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Patino et al
as 2:2020cv01013
Defendant:
Wood Group USA, Inc. and Jacob Rey Patino
Plaintiff:
Alig Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodgers v. Silvertip Completion Services Operating, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00896
Plaintiff:
Glen Rodgers
Defendant:
Michael Wood, Silvertip Completion Services Operating, LLC and William Michael Wood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Woods v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo et al
as 1:2020cv00529
Defendant:
Betty Valdez and Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo
Plaintiff:
Amber Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandoval v. Bernalillo County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2019cv00857
Defendant:
Tyler Jenkins, J Garcia, Kyle Hartock and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy et al v. City of Farmington et al
as 1:2019cv00639
Defendant:
James Moore, Zack Wood, City of Farmington and others
Plaintiff:
Tamara Turner, Dennis Murphy and Walter Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Szuszalski v. Fields et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
Shannon Szuszalski
Defendant:
Douglas C Wood, Rudy Fields, Sandoval County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wood v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00790
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wood v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2018cv00575
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Wood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
