Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Scott, et al v. Dona Ana County Commissioners, et al
as 12-2063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARON SCOTT and DURYEA SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
DONA ANA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DONA ANA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, GARY KING and others
Defendant:
DONA ANA COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY, ALLEN DAVIS, Individually, and in his capacity as Director of Dona Ana County Humane Society, DEANISE MARTA, Individually, and in her capacity as Director of Dona Ana County Humane Society and others
Sanabria v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2012cv00266
Defendant:
Mellisa Armstrong, 12th Judicial District Attorney's Office, Otero County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Sanabria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villa, et al v. Dona Ana County, et al
as 11-2227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARGARITO VILLA, GRACIELA SALINAS, OSCAR BONILLA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DONA ANA COUNTY, a local public body of the State of New Mexico, CITY OF LAS CRUCES, a local public body of the State of New Mexico, DONA ANA COUNTY SHERRIF'S DEPARTMENT, a local public body of the State of New Mexico and others
Kiowa Association, et al v. King, et al
as 11-2056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIOWA ASSOCIATION, in association with the Kiowa Indian Tribe under the provision of CFR 25 through Elton Lowry, as Director and NEW MEXICO GAME FOWL BREEDERS ASSOCIATION, through Ronald Barron as President and its members and all others similarly situated and/or injured
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY KING, Attorney General of New Mexico, OTERO COUNTY SHERIFF, individually, HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Childress, et al v. Midvale City, et al
as 11-4038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSLER LORAYMOND CHILDRESS and GEORGIA CHILDRESS
Defendant - Appellee:
MIDVALE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, KRESDON BENNETT and others
Duttle et al v. Childress et al
as 2:2010cv00839
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Duttle, Sharon Duttle and Shaun Duttle
Defendant:
Curtis Childress, Robin Gojkovich, Carlos Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Quapaw Tribe of OK, et al v. Asarco Incorporated, et al
as 4:2003cv00846
Plaintiff:
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, The , John L Berrey , Colleen Wilson Austin and others
Defendant:
Blue Tee Corporation , Childress Royalty Company , Doe Run Resources Corporation, The and others
Counter_claimant:
Blue Tee Corporation , Gold Fields Mining Corporation , Doe Run Resources Corporation, The and others
Counter_defendant:
Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma, The, Colleen Wilson Austin, Edwina Faye Busby and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Blue Tee Corporation , Gold Fields Mining Corporation and Doe Run Resources Corporation, The
Third_party_defendant:
United States of America , Billye D Albright, James E Gilmore and others
Cross_claimant:
Childress Royalty Company , Blue Tee Corporation , Gold Fields Mining Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
United States of America , Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company , Colleen Wilson Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Beets et al v. Blue Tee Corp. et al
as 4:2009cv00546
Plaintiff:
Sammy Beets, Sammy Beets, Sammy Beets and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
Blue Tee Corp., Blue Tee Corp., Blue Tee Corp. and others
Defendant:
Blue Tee Corp., Blue Tee Corp., Gold Fields Mining, LLC and others
Third Party Defendant:
United States of America, United States of America, Deborah J Maddox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Scott v. County of Dona Ana et al
as 2:2009cv00797
Plaintiff:
Daron Scott
Defendant:
County of Dona Ana, Dona Ana County Commissioners, Dona Ana County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Scott v. County of Dona Ana et al
as 2:2009cv00799
Plaintiff:
Duryea D Scott
Defendant:
County of Dona Ana, Dona Ana County Commissioners, Dona Ana County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
