Cases 31 - 40 of 807
Davis (PS) v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv02213
Plaintiff:
Willie Davis
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. United States Government et al
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Myrtis Paulo Hart
Defendant:
United States Government, Metropolitan Detention Center, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Regional Director, et al
as 23-1252
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, Federal Bureau of Prisons, North Central Regional Office and C. CARTER, Warden
In re: Pitts
as 23-1244
Petitioner:
EDGAR NELSON PITTS
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, CUNDIFF, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Crawford (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01878
Plaintiff:
Glendon Scott Crawford
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (PS) v. Ciolli et al.
as 1:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Wilson Wifred Luargas Garcia
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, Merrick Garland and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kristich v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00544
Plaintiff:
Orin Kristich
Defendant:
United States of America, Bureau of Prisons, FNU Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. Zeavin et al
as 5:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Mark Walters
Defendant:
Dr. Spencer Zeavin and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. Ciolli
as 23-1201
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC KING
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW CIOLLI, Warden, Florence FCC and ADX, United States Bureau of Prisons
Garcia v. USA-Cibola County
as 1:2023cv00506
Petitioner:
EZ Garcia
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and USA-Cibola County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
