Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Medina v. Hatch et al
as 1:2009cv00492
Plaintiff:
Dimas Medina
Defendant:
Tim Hatch and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz-Holguin v. Holder, Jr.
as 09-9513
Petitioner:
DIMAS ARMANDO DIAZ-HOLGUIN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Untied States Attorney General, JANET NAPOLITANO, United States Department of Homeland Security Secretary and THOMAS G. SNOW, Executive Office for Immigration Review Acting Director
Reyes v. Williams et al
as 1:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Mark Reyes
Defendant:
Joseph Williams, William Richardson, George Tapia and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United Transportation Union Lo, et al v. City of Albuquerque, et al
as 08-2103
Plaintiff:
UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION LOCAL 1745, ROBERT C. GUTIERREZ, Chairman, JOHN D. HUNTER, President and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, MARTIN CHAVEZ, Mayor and LAWRENCE RAEL, Chief Administrative Officer
Attorney - Appellant:
PAUL STEVEN LIVINGSTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00460
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Dimas v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Mario M Dimas
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Apodaca v. Dantis et al
as 6:2007cv01039
Plaintiff:
Dimas L Apodaca
Defendant:
John Dantis, Thaddeus Lucero and Ronald C Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Apodaca v. Dantis et al
as 1:2007cv01039
Plaintiff:
Dimas L Apodaca
Defendant:
John Dantis, Thaddeus Lucero and Ronald C Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodarte v. BSD Express et al
as 1:2007cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dimas Rodarte, Dimas Rodarte and Dimas Rodarte
Defendant:
BSD Express, Vasily Babchuk and Vadim Y. Andronovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
