Cases 31 - 40 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Colvin
as 14-6097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHANDLER E BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Maurer v. United Recovery Group et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maurer
Defendant:
United Recovery Group, URG LLC, SRL & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Bruner-McMahon, et al v. County of Sedgwick, et al
as 13-3035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERA M. BRUNER-MCMAHON and KATHLEEN A. GULLEDGE, as Co-Administrators of the Estate of Terry Albert Bruner, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
MARQUE JAMESON
Defendant:
SEDGWICK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SEDGWICK, a political subdivision of the State of Kansas, SEDGWICK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and others
Brown v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv01272
Plaintiff:
Chandler E Brown
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chen v. United Recovery Group et al
as 2:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Tim Chen
Defendant:
United Recovery Group, URG LLC, SRL & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00689
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00600
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Brown et al
as 5:2012cv04051
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jason Michael Ralph Brown, Mary E. Brown, Kansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
