Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc. v. Smith
as 1:2007cv01939
Plaintiff: Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.
Defendant: James A.M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Schott
as 5:2007cv03134
Plaintiff: James Preston Smith
Defendant: Richard W Schott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Grady et al v. Ritter et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00749
Plaintiff: Donald Adam Penrod
Defendant: Bill Ritter, Colorado Department of Personnel, Ed Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
New England Health, et al v. Woodruff, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1482
Plaintiff - Appellee: NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, CLIFFORD MOSHER, TEJINDER SINGH and others
Defendant - Appellant: ROBERT S. WOODRUFF and JOSEPH P. NACCHIO
Defendant - Appellee: QWEST COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL, INC., DRAKE S. TEMPEST, JAMES A. SMITH and others
Defendant: ROBIN R. SZELIGA, GREGORY CASEY, MARK IWAN and others
Intervenor: CHARLES REINER and MARGARET M. FLANAGAN
In re: Qwest Communications International, Inc. Securities and Erisa Litigation (MDL-1788) Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv17880
Plaintiff: New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York State Common Retirement Fund and others
Defendant: Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Communications International, Inc., Qwest Communications International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Kearney v. DiManna, et al
as 04-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES F. KEARNEY
Defendant - Appellee: VINCENT DIMANNA, KEN A. OVERMAN, MARK HANEY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?