Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Brake et al v. BC Stables, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01439
Plaintiff:
Gene Brake and Bayley Brake
Defendant:
BC Stables, LLC, Vail Resorts, Inc. and Vail Corporation, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Durham v. The Vail Corporation
as 10-1239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY DURHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
THE VAIL CORPORATION, a Colorado corporation, DBA Vail Associates, Inc.
Snyder et al v. Vail Resorts, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02170
Plaintiff:
Anthony Snyder, Anthony Snyder, Catherine Snyder and others
Defendant:
Vail Resorts, Inc., Vail Corporation, The and Vail Summit Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Holm, et al v. David Lorenzen, et al
as 08-1446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARCY HOLM and DONNA M HOLM
Defendant - Appellee:
THE VAIL CORPORATION, d/b/a Vail Associates, Inc.,
Defendant:
DAVID KIRK LORENZEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Confluence Metropolitan District et al v. East West Resort Development XIV, L.P., L.L.L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv00947
Petitioner:
Confluence Metropolitan District, Confluence Metropolitan District, Confluence Metropolitan District and others
Respondent:
East West Resort Development XIV, L.P., L.L.L.P., Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101 Rail Transportation
Hartman et al v. Vail Resorts, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00193
Plaintiff:
Judith K. Hartman and Roger C. Hartman
Defendant:
Vail Resorts, Inc., Vail Holdings, Inc., Vail Associates, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Holm et al v. Lorenzen et al
as 1:2007cv00031
Plaintiff:
Darcy Lee Holm, Darcy Lee Holm, Donna Marie Holm and others
Defendant:
David Kirk Lorenzen, Vail Corporation, The and Vail Corporation, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
