Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,470
Scaife v. Jacques, et al
as 24-1240
Respondent: TERRY JACQUES, Warden, ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, CDOC and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Petitioner: VERYL B. SCAIFE
Owen v. Powell
as 24-4065
Respondent: ROBERT POWELL, Warden, STATE OF UTAH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: SEAN C. OWEN
Chukwurah v. Harding
as 24-6108
Petitioner: DAVID BRYAN EMEKA CHUKWURAH
Respondent: RANDY HARDING, Warden
Kristich v. Casady, et al
as 24-6107
Defendant: FNU CRANE, Dr., MD, in official and individual capacity, FNU POYNER, Health Services Administrator, in official and individual capacity, FNU GUTIERREZ, Warden, in official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff: ORIN KRISTICH
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner: PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent: VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Armajo v. State of Wyoming, et al
as 24-8040
Defendant: DIANE SCHWARTZKOPF, individually and as iWyoming Department of Corrections Medium Correctional Institution mail room supervisor, STATE OF WYOMING, MS. CASTELLO, individually and as Wyoming Department of Corrections Honor Conservation Camp mail room supervisor and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES ALFRED ARMAJO, JR.
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8038
Petitioner: SEAN ROGERS
Respondent: STATE OF WYOMING, WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity, AKA Neicole Molden
Hess v. Quick
as 24-5064
Respondent: CHRISTE QUICK, Warden
Petitioner: DARYL A. HESS
In re: Vreeland
as 24-1234
Petitioner: DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II
Respondent: DAVID ZUPAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Moore v. Hodge, et al
as 24-1230
Defendant: WARDEN LITTLE, MARSHALL GRIFFITH, (CSP) and DR. HODGE, (CSP)
Plaintiff: ARTHUR JAMES MOORE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?