Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Burr v. Tame et al
as 2:2009cv00970
Defendant:
Jaren Tame, Brent Dietrich, FNU Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Burr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Harris v. Board of Pardons and Parole
as 2:2008cv00924
Petitioner:
Willie B. Harris
Respondent:
Board of Pardons and Parole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Farnsworth et al
as 2:2008cv00840
Plaintiff:
Willie Casanova Moore
Defendant:
FNU Farnsworth, M. Mellor and Steven Turley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Turley
as 2:2008cv00729
Petitioner:
Willie B. Harris
Respondent:
Steven Turley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Petersen et al v. Riverton City
as 2:2008cv00664
Plaintiff:
Willis Lauritz Petersen, Jr., Willis Lauritz Petersen, Jr., Willis Lauritz Petersen, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Riverton City and Riverton City
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2008cv00444
Petitioner:
Willie Casanova Moore
Respondent:
State of Utah and Cara Tangaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDonald et al v. BEKO Associates et al
as 2:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, George Bosiljevac, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
BEKO Associates and Beatrix Koev
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McDonald et al v. Steel Ventures et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
Michael McDonald, George Bosiljevac, Mike Baker and others
Defendant:
Steel Ventures and Steve Jolley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. Garner et al
as 2:2008cv00159
Plaintiff:
Willie Casanova Moore
Defendant:
Curis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos, Keith N. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adams et al v. Grider et al
as 2:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Phillip M. Adams, Phillip M. Adams, Phillip M. Adams & Associates, L.L.C. and others
Defendant:
Stephen Grider, Beverly Grider, Deborah Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
