Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Hi-Tech Bed Systems Corporation v. United States General Services Administration et al
as 2:2011cv00293
Plaintiff: Hi-Tech Bed Systems Corporation
Defendant: United States General Services Administration , United States General Services Administration Administrator , United States General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Hillside Environmental Loss, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant: HILLSIDE ENVIRONMENTAL LOSS PREVENTION, INC., KANSAS NATURAL RESOURCE COUNSEL, CHRIS AXE and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity, ROGER A. WISON, JR., Colonel, in his official capacity and others
Patey v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 2:2011cv00585
Plaintiff: Kenneth C. Patey
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
P.F. McCarthy, Inc. v. Compass Capital Group, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01246
Plaintiff: P.F. McCarthy, Inc.
Defendant: Compass Capital Group, LLC, Ryan Eller, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Cross_claimant: Schommer Construction, LLC
Cross_defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers , Herron Electric Company, Public Trustee of El Paso County, Colorado, The and others
Counter_claimant: Schommer Construction, LLC
Counter_defendant: P.F. McCarthy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
Jordan River Restoration, et al v. United States Army Corps, et al
as 11-4069
Plaintiff - Appellant: JORDAN RIVER RESTORATION NETWORK, a Utah non-profit corporation, DBA The Spirit of Utah Wilderness, Inc., JEFF SALT, an individual, DANNY POTTS, an individual and others
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Sacramento Division, Utah Regulatory Office, WILLIAM J. LEADY, District Engineeer of the Sacramento District and JASON GIPSON, Chief of Nevada-Utah Regulatory Branch
Intervenor: SALT LAKE CITY CORPORATION, a municipal corporation
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-7016
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Ex rel, United States of America
Jordan River Restoration Network et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00040
Plaintiff: Jordan River Restoration Network , Jeff Salt , Danny Potts and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers , William J. Leady and Jason Gipson
Intervenor_defendant: Salt Lake City Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00318
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2010cv02068
Plaintiff: Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Robert L. Van Antwerp and Roger A. Wilson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Hillsdale Environmental Loss Prevention, Inc. et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02008
Plaintiff: Hillsdale Environmental Loss Prevention, Inc., Hillsdale Environmental Loss Prevention, Inc., Kansas Natural Resource Council and others
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Robert L. Van Antwerp, Roger A. Wilson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?