Cases 51 - 60 of 101
Bartlett v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv01535
Plaintiff:
Leon Bartlett
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Michael Miller, Amie Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Miller, et al
as 15-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH E. FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden, CCCF and VICKI LEWIS
King v. Miller et al
as 1:2015cv01363
Petitioner:
Clarence King
Respondent:
Michael Miller and Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tennyson v. Raemisch, et al
as 15-1166
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AUDREY LEE TENNYSON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, CDOC Director, MICHAEL MILLER, CCCF Warden, MELINDA MCMILLIAN, CCCF Bookkeeper and others
Jimenez v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv01006
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lolin Jimenez
Respondent:
Colorado Department of Corrections , Rick Raemisch , Crowley County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. State of Colorado
as 1:2015cv00996
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Rick Raemisch, Rick (I) Raemisch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tennyson v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2015cv00707
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Tennyson
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Michael Miller , Melinda McMillan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassler v. Miller, et al
as 15-1082
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE E. HASSLER
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
King v. Miller, et al
as 15-1074
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE KING
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MILLER, Warden, Crowley County Correctional Facility and JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General of the State of Colorado
Hassler, Jr. v. Miller et al
as 1:2015cv00240
Petitioner:
Clarence E. Hassler, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Miller and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
