Cases 51 - 60 of 109
United States of America v. Real Property Commonly Known As 7208 East 65th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2015cv00324
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Commonly Known As 7208 East 65th Place, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Real Property Commonly Known As 10711 South Sheridian Road, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Real Property Commonly Known As 10716 South 66th East Avenue, Tulsa, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Henneman et al v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 1:2015cv00985
Plaintiff:
Maureen Henneman and Jerry Henneman
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Rascon v. Corizon Medical Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rascon
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Corp., Donald Douglas, Maureen Bixenman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Deschine et al v. Kidd et al
as 1:2014cv00762
Plaintiff:
Marisa Deschine and Michael Deschine
Defendant:
Maureen Kidd and Locumtenens.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Di Janni et al v. Biotronik, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
Maureen Di Janni , Vanessa Laney , Nance Schmidt and others
Defendant:
Biotronik, Inc. , Edward Tague, Demosthenis Klonis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buchholz et al v. Target Corporation
as 1:2014cv01494
Plaintiff:
Maureen Buchholz and William E. Buchholz
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
USA v. Long et al
as 4:2014mc00008
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Maureen Long
Defendant:
First National Bank of Broken Arrow
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
