Cases 51 - 60 of 198
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Educare Centre Services et al
as 2:2020mc00117
Defendant:
Mohammad Souheil, Wissam Abedel Jilal, Prolink Vision and others
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio and Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Torgerson, et al v. LCC International, et al
as 20-3020
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY NAVEJAR, AMY OLIPHANT, RODNEY MARTIN and others
Defendant:
DAN MOSS, BRIAN DUNN, REBECCA STAHL and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LCC INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Virginia corporation
Aldawoodi v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03062
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC. and PAX LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Aldawoodi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nsirat et al v. American Strategic Insurance Corporation
as 1:2019cv02894
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Nsirat and Rania Alzarad
Defendant:
American Strategic Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Laghmari v. Barr
as 19-9572
Petitioner:
MOHAMMED LAGHMARI
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
Dirshe v. GEO Group, Inc., The
as 1:2019cv01816
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dirshe
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc. and GEO Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macias v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2019cv01262
Defendant:
Geico Casualty Company, Mohamed Gashota, Twin City Fire Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Macias
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Selim et al v. Denver County District Court
as 1:2019cv00925
Plaintiff:
Saad Kamel Ally and Nagwa Mohamed Selim
Defendant:
Denver County District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Zeidan v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 4:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Zeidan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
