Cases 61 - 70 of 914
United States v. Nunez-Romero
as 23-2034
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MILTON MANUEL NUNEZ-ROMERO
United States v. Nunez-Romero
as 23-2033
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MILTON MANUEL NUNEZ-ROMERO
Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 23-8015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD P. ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Romero v. The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo et al
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jessie Romero and Freddie Dean Chavez
Defendant:
The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Bernalillo, Metropolitan Detention Center, City of Albuquerque - Mayor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. Luna County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Romero
Defendant:
Luna County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. James River Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv04011
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Romero
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Romero v. Wellpath et al
as 1:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
Richard Romero
Defendant:
Wellpath, John Archer, Bertngolis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Stricker-Campos-Romero v. No Named Defendent
as 1:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Misty Lea Stricker-Campos-Romero
Defendant:
No Named Defendent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00002
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Ernest Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
