Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Stine v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 13-3056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, Regional Headquarters, Kansas City, KS and PAUL LAIRD, Regional Director, North Central Bureau of Prisons; JOHN DOES, unknown BOP officials
Pinson et al v. Laird et al
as 5:2013cv03033
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson, Mikeal Glenn Stine and Antoine Bruce
Defendant:
Paul Laird, Amber Nelson, Gordon Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stine v. Berkebile
as 1:2013cv00295
Petitioner:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Respondent:
D. Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stine et al v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2013cv03002
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine and Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Paul Laird, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Stine v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2012cv03346
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
D. Berkebile, Christopher Wilson, Jon Matthes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Stine
as 12-1449
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
D. BERKEBILE, CHRISTOPHER WILSON, JON MATTHES and others
Stine v. Berkebile et al
as 1:2012cv02701
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
D. Berkebile, Christopher Wilson and Jon Matthes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stine v. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 12-1319
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID ALLRED, CHRISTOPHER WILSON and others
Stine v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv02135
Plaintiff:
Mikeal Glenn Stine
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Stine
as 12-1289
Petitioner:
MIKEAL GLENN STINE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, DAVID ALLRED, CHRISTOPHER WILSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
