Cases 71 - 80 of 1,457
Harris v. Vamar Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ashley Harris
Defendant:
Vamar Inc, Saviol Saint Jean, Rey Logistics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Harris v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00924
Plaintiff:
Lequante Nicole Harris
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Small v. Rankins
as 5:2023cv01127
Petitioner:
Vincent Harry Small
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00805
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Harris v. City Cycle Sales
as 23-3214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JEREMY L. HARRIS
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY CYCLE SALES, INC.
Maes (PS) v. Harris
as 1:2023cv02760
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ray Maes
Defendant:
Madeline M. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris (PS) v. Denver District Court
as 1:2023cv02711
Plaintiff:
Dexter Harris
Defendant:
Denver District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLemore v. Harris et al
as 5:2023cv03223
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L. McLemore
Defendant:
Haylee Harris and William Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
