Cases 71 - 80 of 347
Nelson v. Conflict Resolution Services et al
as 1:2020cv03300
Defendant:
Conflict Resolution Services and Kenneth Murray Plotz
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Plotz
as 1:2020cv03240
Plaintiff:
Brett Andrew Nelson
Defendant:
Kenneth Murray Plotz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Colorado State University et al
as 1:2020cv03168
Defendant:
Diana Prieto, Lindy L Henson, Colorado State University Board of Governors and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Hall v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv00674
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hall
Defendant:
Kevin Murray, Val Brown and Salt Lake City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Potter v. Torres et al
as 2:2020cv00823
Plaintiff:
Murray Potter and Murray Jay Potter
Defendant:
Frank Torres and City of Las Cruces
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Murray et al v. Royal Truck & Equipment Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Colton Murray, Mary Murray and Talon Innovative Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Adjuvo Group Ltd, Steven Archer, Robert Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Murray et al v. American Family Insurance Company
as 1:2020cv01574
Plaintiff:
Gina Murray, Maurice E. Murray and Macey Murray
Defendant:
American Family Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.C. Green & Sons, Inc. v. Easi-Pour et al
as 1:2020cv00062
Defendant:
Serfling, Murray Estate of, Easi-Pour, OVB Holdings and others
Plaintiff:
M.C. Green & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heidel, et al v. Mazzola, et al
as 20-1067
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF ANTHONY MAZZOLA, in his individual and official capacity, DEPUTY JOHNNY MURRAY, in his individual capacity, DEPUTY CLINTON KILDUFF, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KERSTEN HEIDEL, GARY HEIDEL, individually, MICHAEL ROWELL, individually and as the personal representative of the Estate of Catherine Rowell and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
