Cases 71 - 80 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2141
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Williams et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv07333
Plaintiff:
Clifton S. Williams and Wiliams Asset Protection Trust
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Texas Life Insurance Company v. Raper et al
as 5:2015cv00418
Plaintiff:
Texas Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amanda Raper and Dana Clifton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Wilson v. Patton et al
as 5:2014cv01420
Petitioner:
Clifton Lee Wilson
Respondent:
Robert Patton and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States v. Bennett
as 14-1402
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CLIFTON BRETT BENNETT
United States v. Bennett
as 14-1384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CLIFTON BENNETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
