Cases 71 - 80 of 163
L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design, Inc. v. Julie Anne Reese et al.
as 2:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
L.A. Gem and Jewelry Design, Inc
Defendant:
Julie Anne Reese
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Dominguez v. Hauf et al
as 5:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
Ricky G Dominguez
Defendant:
R B Hauf and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dominguez v. Hauf et al
as 4:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gerard Dominguez, Sr
Defendant:
R B Hauf, Reese Lane, Kevin Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundquist Bros Inc. et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv09012
Plaintiff:
Lundquist Bros, Inc. , Rick Arnold , Tom J. Klug and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lietzke v. Montgomery County Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County Alabama, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Patel
as 5:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Smith , Reese Travis and Kevin Lamb
Defendant:
Chintu Patel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leonard v. Haskell, et al
as 14-8092
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEON A. LEONARD
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HASKELL, Sweetwater County Detention Center Sheriff, RICK HAWKINS, Sweetwater County Detention Center Major, CRYSTALYN VALENCIANO, Sweetwater County Detention Center Lieutenant and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leonard v. Haskell et al
as 2:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Deon A Leonard
Defendant:
Richard Haskell , Sweetwater County Detention Center Sheriff , Rick Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke et al v. Bevan-Rabell, Inc.
as 6:2014cv01369
Plaintiff:
Veronica Sue Clarke , Alex Patrick Clarke , Cooper Clarke and others
Defendant:
Bevan-Rabell, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
