Cases 81 - 90 of 182
Evergreen Ranch v. Perdue et al
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
Evergreen Ranch
Defendant:
George Erving Perdue , United States Department of Agriculture , LuAnn Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hunter v. HCA et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Hunter
Defendant:
HCA , Mountainstar Health , Columbia Ogden Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Miller et al
as 2:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
John Miller, Linda Miller and Adams LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finlinson v. Millard County et al
as 2:2016cv01009
Plaintiff:
George Finlinson
Defendant:
Millard County, Millard County Sheriff's Office, Robert Dekker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. NALS Apartment Homes et al
as 2:2016cv01005
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
NALS Apartment Homes , N/A Pinnacle Highland-80 , NALS Utah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Utah Pipe Trades Pension Trust Fund et al v. Service Mechanical Controls
as 2:2016cv00902
Plaintiff:
Utah Pipe Trades Pension Trust Fund , Utah Pipe Trades Welfare Trust Fund , Utah Career Center Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Service Mechanical Controls
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Cobb v. Winder et al
as 2:2016cv00885
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Defendant:
James Winder, Scott Carver, Pamela Lofgreen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Adams et al
as 2:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Peterson
Defendant:
Ian Adams, Doug Diamond, West Jordan City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. CR England
as 2:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
Adam Brent Wallace
Defendant:
CR England
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
