Cases 81 - 90 of 554
Nellson v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
Edward Nellson
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noe v. United States Government
as 1:2021cv00780
Defendant:
B. True, Berkley, H. Schouweiler and others
Plaintiff:
Peter George Noe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McRae v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 21-4033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN PLATO MCRAE
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FNU FIELDING, FNU CHENEY, Sgt. and others
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Locke v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv03051
Defendant:
R. Echols, B. Root, (fnu) Calkers and others
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Locke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horner et al v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2021cv00105
Defendant:
L Howard, CO Watkins, Lt. LaSalle and others
Plaintiff:
John R Horner and Billy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akers v. Flannigan, et al
as 21-3019
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN SPROUL, Warden, SAM A. CROW, Federal judge, J. PHIL GILBERT, Federal judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Crump v. FBP, et al
as 21-1032
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRAL OFFICE, REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM FLORENCE, COLORADO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORVELL CRUMP
Issac v. Carvajal, et al
as 1:2021cv00220
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Carvajal and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Hashi Issac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
