Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rejda v. United States of America
as 2:2018cv00191
Petitioner:
Norman Charles Rejda
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Norman v. Wyo Tech
as 2:2016cv00250
Plaintiff:
Wayne H Norman
Defendant:
Wyo Tech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rejda v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Norman Charles Rejda
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Leonard v. Haskell et al
as 2:2014cv00233
Plaintiff:
Deon A Leonard
Defendant:
Richard Haskell , Sweetwater County Detention Center Sheriff , Rick Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillette v. Tucker et al
as 2:2013cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette
Defendant:
Norman Tucker and Hampl Transportation Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wagner v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ella Vernel Wagner
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Robert J Hopp & Associates LLC, State of Wyoming and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Schmitz et al v. Diao et al
as 2:2011cv00157
Plaintiff:
Norman M Schmitz and Steve R Diehl
Defendant:
Xiqing Diao, Wenhua Guo, Baiyun Sun and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. O'Connor et al
as 2:2011cv00072
Plaintiff:
Marcie L Anderson
Defendant:
Joe O'Connor , Navajo Express Inc , Norman L Buxton , Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrison et al
as 2:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Doreen Garrison , Norman Macintosh , Wyoming Association of Correctional Employees and others
Defendant:
State of Wyoming, Wyoming Department of Corrections, Robert Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kent et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2009cv00243
Plaintiff:
Janette Kent, John Salter and Synergy Venture Corp
Defendant:
Milton O Brown, Carolyn C Brune and Norman L Lindstedt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
