Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Jaramillo v. North Restaurants LLC
as 2:2024cv02115
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Jaramillo, Donald Zahnd, Deisha Dabdoub and others
Defendant:
North Restaurants LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Doe 2 et al v. New Mexico State University et al
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2 and Jane Doe 3
Defendant:
New Mexico State University, New Mexico State University Board of Regents, Joseph Berning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pope v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
Sarah Pope
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag - Fed. Question - Employment Discrimination (Age)
Pope v. Wells Fargo Bank N A et al
as 2:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Jillane L. Pope
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA, JP Morgan Chase Bank and Company N A, Jon Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Pope v. Marshall et al
as 1:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Jared Pope, Jared Pope, D.D.S., P.L.C. and Proverus Management, LLC
Defendant:
Duane Marshall, Mountain View Family Dentists, LLC and Mountain Vista Family Dentistry and Orthodontics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Pope v. Buchanan
as 4:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Joey Edward Pope
Defendant:
Kevin Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pope v. Snyder et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
David S. Pope
Defendant:
Ronald H. Snyder, Benefits for Corporate America, Benefit Strategies Group and others
Pope v. Snyder et al
as 2:2023mc00018
Plaintiff:
David S. Pope
Defendant:
Ronald H. Snyder, Benefits for Corporate America, Benefit Strategies Group and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
