Cases 1 - 10 of 878
Singh v. Opperman
as 1:2024cv02517
Defendant:
David A. Opperman
Plaintiff:
Inder P. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Dimick v. Garland
as 1:2024cv02521
Defendant:
Paul Abbate, Alex (I) Zappe, Six Unknown Named Federal Agents and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Dimick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fogarty et al v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv02455
Plaintiff:
Daniel P Fogarty and Lisa D Fogarty
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nelson et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02426
Plaintiff:
Joseph S Nelson and Anne P McDonald
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Grenier (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv02165
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Petitioner:
Albert P. Grenier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Discrimination
Barr v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv02017
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Melanie P Barr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Hale-El (PS) v. Colwell et al
as 1:2024cv01930
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Colwell, Denver County Commissioners, Adams County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grenier (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01621
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Plaintiff:
Albert P. Grenier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rich v. Feyan et al
as 1:2024cv01496
Defendant:
Steve Reams, Poudre Valley Hospital, Jeffrey A. Bontrager and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
