Cases 1 - 10 of 313
Dimick v. Garland
as 1:2024cv02521
Defendant:
Paul Abbate, Alex (I) Zappe, Six Unknown Named Federal Agents and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ryan Dimick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00912
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Iqbal et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 5:2024cv00920
Defendant:
Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B Garland
Plaintiff:
Malak Dabboussi and Hamza Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01834
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Martinez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Rob Mather and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00885
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02313
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
