Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hicks v. Whitten
as 5:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Charles P Hicks
Defendant:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chilton v. Nunn
as 5:2022cv00032
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Director DOC Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Charles P Chilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chilton v. Nunn
as 6:2022cv00014
Respondent:
John O'Connell, Scott Crow, John O and others
Petitioner:
Charles P. Chilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos, et al v. Banner Health, et al
as 20-1231
Defendant / Appellee:
WILFORD A. CARDON, THOMAS R. KOELBL, DENNIS DAHLEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELRI HANSON, individually and as representatives of a class of plan participants, on behalf of Banner Health Employees 401(k) Plan, CONSTANCE R. WILLIAMSON, KAREN F. MCLEOD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Romero v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Charles P Romero
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 4:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Charles P Dawson and Ryan Hodge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutton v. Woodall
as 1:2013cv01338
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hutton
Defendant:
Charles P. Woodall, IV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2520 Interception of Communications
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. VIP Limousine Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00376
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
VIP Limousine Services, Inc. and Charles P Cotton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
