Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Brodzki v. Clear Channel Communication
as 11-6323
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BRODSKI
Defendant - Appellee:
CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS
Brodski v. Clear Channel Communications
as 5:2011cv01395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brodski
Defendant:
Clear Channel Communications
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kahn v. iBiquity Digital et al
as 2:2009cv00814
Plaintiff:
Leonard R. Kahn
Defendant:
iBiquity Digital, Lucent Technologies, Clear Channel Communications and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Wagner v. Live Nation Motor Sports, Inc., et al
as 07-3365
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARTHUR C. WAGNER, JR., Individually and for the benefit of Jean Marie Wagner
Defendant - Appellant:
SFX MOTOR SPORTS, INC., DBA Clear Channel Entertainmentmotor Sports
Defendant:
HEARTLAND PARK RACEWAY, LLC
Jiron et al v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00692
Defendant:
Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harry L. Jiron and Sandra Jiron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jiron et al v Teamsec, Inc., et al
as 2:2007cv00692
Plaintiff:
Harry L. Jiron, Harry L. Jiron, Sandra Jiron and others
Defendant:
Teamsec, Inc., Event One Staffing, Inc., Aramark Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Emmis Comm Corp v. Media Strategies Inc, et al
as 1:2000cv02507
Plaintiff:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Defendant:
Media Strategies, Inc., AMFM, Inc. and Clear Channel Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Emmis Comm Corp v. Clear Channel Comm, et al
as 1:2000cv02506
Plaintiff:
Emmis Communications Corporation an Indiana corporation doing business as KALC-FM
Defendant:
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., Tsunami Communications Co. doing business as KTCL-FM and AMFM Radio Licenses, LLC doing business as KYSR-FM
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
