Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Moore v. COG Operating, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Moore
Defendant:
COG Operating, LLC, ConocoPhillips Company, John Doe Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Benavidez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Ernesto J Benavidez
Respondent:
Ronald Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Doe et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Carlos Doe, Luis Doe, Ernesto Doe and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Quezada v. Dairyland Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv01204
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Quezada
Defendant:
Dairyland Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States v. Avalos
as 23-2089
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNESTO AVALOS
Johnson v. Sanders, et al
as 23-7031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONE M. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SANDERS, RAY LARIMER, ERNESTO MARTINEZ and others
Steele v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01158
Petitioner:
Omar Alberto Steele
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ernesto Santa Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01044
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
United States v. Perez-Asuncion
as 23-2061
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERNESTO PEREZ-ASUNCION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00571
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
