Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Fox
as 1:2017cv00655
Petitioner:
Q. Ili-Yaas H. Farrakhan-Muhammad
Respondent:
Jack Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. United States, et al
as 17-1021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Q. ILI-YAAS H. FARRAKHAN-MUHAMMAD, AKA Christopher Mitchell, AKA C. Eli-Jah Hakeem Muhammad, AKA Elijah Hakeem Muhammad, AKA Caliph Ili-Yas Az Hake Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C. LINDGREN, Complex Psychiatric Nurse Coordinator, M. GOODIN, Complex Chief Psychiatrist and others
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Oliver
as 16-1445
Petitioner - Appellant:
Q ILIYAAS FARRAKHAN-MUHAMMAD
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN OLIVER, ADX-Warden
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Oliver
as 16-1367
Petitioner - Appellant:
Q ILIYAAS FARRAKHAN-MUHAMMAD, AKA Q Ili-Yaas Farrakhan-Muhammad, AKA Christopher Mitchell, AKA C. Eli-Jah Hakeem Muhammad, AKA Elijah Hakeem Muhammad, AKA Caliph Ili-Yaz Az-Haakeem Muhammad
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN OLIVER, Complex Warden
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Fox
as 1:2016cv02272
Petitioner:
Q. Ili-Yaas H. Farrakhan-Muhammad
Respondent:
Jack Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. USA et al
as 1:2016cv02082
Plaintiff:
Q. Ili-Yaas H. Farrakhan-Muhammad
Defendant:
USA, C. Lingren, M. Goodin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Oliver
as 1:2015cv02266
Petitioner:
Q. Ili-Yaas H. Farrakhan-Muhammad
Respondent:
J. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Oliver
as 1:2015cv02222
Petitioner:
Q. Ihiyaas Farrakhan-Muhammad
Respondent:
John Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Farrakhan-Muhammad v. Oliver
as 1:2015cv01880
Petitioner:
Q Iliyaas Farrakhan-Muhammad
Respondent:
John Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
