Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Gabler v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1199
Petitioner:
VICTOR GABLER
Respondent:
MARC FAIRBAIRN, Warden and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Simkins v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. SIMKINS
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Brown v. Marquez et al
as 1:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Ezamika Brown
Defendant:
Marquez, Juarez, Mark Fairbairn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Fairbairn, et al
as 24-1101
Petitioner:
CHARLES FREDERICK WADE
Respondent:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Stone (PS) v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2024cv00569
Petitioner:
Dale S. Stone and Dale S. Garcia
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barry v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ryan Barry
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Penny McCarl, Patsy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeAtley v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1406
Petitioner:
ALAN DEATLEY, Tribal member, Tribal Sp. Counsel, Tribal Judge
Respondent:
WARDEN FAIRBAIRN, (A.V.C.F.), DIRECTOR WILLIAMS, (CDOC), GOV. POLIS and others
Watson v. Fairbairn, et al
as 23-1392
Petitioner / Appellant:
WARREN D. WATSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK FAIRBAIRN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF COLORADO
Wade (PS) v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2023cv03185
Petitioner:
Charles Frederick Wade
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez (PS) v. Fairbairn et al
as 1:2023cv03175
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Martinez
Respondent:
Mark Fairbairn and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
