Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Swipejobs v. Garcia
as 2:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Swipejobs
Defendant:
Francisco Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Marcus Todd Brisco et al
as 2:2023mc00111
Defendant:
Fredirick Safranko, Marcus Todd Brisco, YAS Castellum and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Receiver:
Kelly Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Peck et al v. Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 2:2020cv00321
Defendant:
California, State of, Fiona Ma, Lou Correa and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Louis Peck and Jay Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Cascade Collections
as 2:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Cascade Collections
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, The et al
as 2:2019mc00219
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Lucky Lager Brewing Company of San Francisco, The, Utah Pharmaceutical Association, Beatrice Foods Co et al and others
S. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Francisco S.
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and World Bank Group Medical Insurance Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Pro Star Logistics v. Freighttranz Florida et al
as 2:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Pro Star Logistics
Defendant:
Freighttranz Florida, Freighttranz Nevada, Frank Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Saenz v. Utah State Hospital et al
as 2:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
Francisco Miguel Saenz
Defendant:
Utah State Hospital, Don Rosenbaum, Mellisa LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero-Barajas v. USA
as 2:2017cv00228
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Romero-Barajas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
