Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Roberts v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
Jeffery G. Roberts
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Demos v. United States, et al
as 20-3135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN G. ROBERTS, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, WASHINGTON, DC, City of and others
Demos v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv03170
Defendant:
Washington, DC, City of, John G. Roberts, Mike Pence and others
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bastemeyer v. Burnham et al
as 2:2018cv00546
Defendant:
Tony Washington, FNU Umbrell, Bruce O. Burnham and others
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Wayne Bastemeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albright et al v. Yates
as 6:2018cv00073
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Albright and Nicholas G. Roberts
Defendant:
James Yates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Turley et al
as 2:2015cv00668
Plaintiff:
Robert Baker
Defendant:
Steven Turley, Alfred C. Bigelow, Richard Garden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Department of Corrections Medical Department et al
as 2:2015cv00611
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
Department of Corrections Medical Department, Sidney G. Roberts, Kennon Tubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds, et al
as 15-6158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKKE LEON GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAN REYNOLDS, ROBERT PATTON, Director, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Mata v. Douglas et al
as 2:2015cv00575
Plaintiff:
Edgardo Mata
Defendant:
Aaron Douglas, Utah State Prison, Alfred Bigelow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Reynolds et al
as 5:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
Rickke L Green
Defendant:
Dan Reynolds, Robert Patton, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
