Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rascon v. Douglas, et al
as 16-2251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RASCON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD DOUGLAS, MAUREEN BIXENMAN and LISA STABLER
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, V. KEELING, G.E.O. GROUP INC. and others
Rascon v. Corizon Medical Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rascon
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Corp., Donald Douglas, Maureen Bixenman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Lyden et al
as 1:2013cv00964
Plaintiff:
Tommy Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Lyden, Joe Driver, Tammy Anding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinzo v. State of N.M. Dept. of Corr., et al
as 13-2060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN JAMES HINZO
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE TAPIA, WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Johnson v. G.E.O. Group Inc., et al
as 1:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
Jesse Johnson
Defendant:
Joe D. Driver, Tami Anding and G.E.O. Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. G.E.O. Group Inc., et al.
as 2:2012cv00830
Plaintiff:
David J. Lopez
Defendant:
G.E.O. Group Inc and B. Gania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMullin v. Bravo et al
as 1:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Bobbie McMullin
Defendant:
E. Bravo, Lupe Martinez and G.E.O.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sandoval v. D.O.C. et al
as 1:2011cv00938
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Sandoval
Defendant:
D.O.C., Lupe Martinez, G.E.O. Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Martinez et al
as 1:2011cv00581
Plaintiff:
Alec Jay Johnson
Defendant:
FNU Martinez, Gary King, Timothy Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. G.E.O. State of New Mexico Medical et al
as 1:2009cv00494
Plaintiff:
Angel Perez
Defendant:
Warden, Correctional Officers, Special Task Investigation Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
