Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Gould v. Art Institute of Chicago, The
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Ann Marie Gould
Defendant:
Art Institute of Chicago, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Werts et al v. Cabot Lodge Securities, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
ANN LOUISE WERTS and DAN WERTS
Defendant:
CABOT LODGE SECURITIES, CRAIG GOULD, Cabot Lodge Securities, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Gould v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Kirston Gould
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Gould v. PS Audio, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Peter Gould
Defendant:
PS Audio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Taylor v. Willis et al
as 1:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Taylor
Defendant:
Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Petitioner:
Damian Betebenner, Cigdem Betebenner and Chris Dobson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Clifton v. Willis et al
as 1:2022cv03161
Plaintiff:
Dennis Clifton
Defendant:
Brent Willis, Fred Cooper, Tim Haas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Gould v. Wyse, et al
as 22-2075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN GOULD
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WYSE, WYSE ADVISORS, LLC, DW PARTNERS and others
Clervrain v. Biden et al
as 6:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Lynn Rogers, Jennifer Goetz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wade et al v. Industrial Supply et al
as 2:2022cv00097
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Carrier Corporation, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Wade and Deana Lyn Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bushansky v. CorePoint Lodging, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00308
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
CorePoint Lodging, Inc., Keith A. Cline, James R. Abrahamson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
