Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Barker v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv00744
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. 66.75 acres of land et al
as 5:2018cv01221
Defendant:
United States Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs Trustee in Trust on behalf of the known Heirs of MESH-AH-QUOT Mexican Kickapoo Allotment No 823MK 63, Delyn Bullock, Gabriel Wayne Bullock and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Gutierrez v. Raemisch
as 1:2018cv01033
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Gutierrez
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Albright v. Raemisch, et al
as 14-1496
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY DEAN ALBRIGHT
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Exec. Dir. CDOC, DAVID WALCHER, Arapahoe County Sheriff and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Ponder v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Ponder
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Albright v. Ramisch [sic] et al
as 1:2014cv02364
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Albright
Defendant:
Rick Ramisch [sic] and Rick (I) Ramisch [sic]
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trujillo v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv01848
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dean Trujillo
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Albright v. Raemisch
as 1:2014cv01505
Petitioner:
Gregory Dean Albright
Respondent:
Rick Raemisch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Albright v. Raemisch, et al
as 13-1358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY DEAN ALBRIGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections and JOHN SUTHERS, The Atorney General of the State of Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
