Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Minski (ID 46461) v. Lewis
as 5:2024cv03014
Plaintiff:
James Edward Minski
Defendant:
Sonya Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rochard et al v. One World Messenger et al
as 2:2023cv00194
Plaintiff:
Ralph Peter John Henry Rochard and Con Smith
Defendant:
One World Messenger LLC, TEK Resources LLC, James Edward Bame and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Edwards et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Rio Grande County et al
as 1:2023cv02041
Plaintiff:
James Edwards and Debbie Edwards
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Rio Grande County, Astronaut Kent Rominger Airport, The, Astronaut Kent Rominger Airport Advisory Board, The and others
Kolak v. Arapahoe Sheriff's Detention Facility et al
as 1:2022cv02743
Plaintiff:
Walter M. Kolak
Defendant:
Arapahoe Sheriff's Detention Facility, D Backerville, Carl Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Mongtomery
as 21-5061
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD MONGTOMERY
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC
Campbell et al v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2021cv00615
Defendant:
US Express Logistics III LLC and James Edward Hoffman
Plaintiff:
Chantelle Campbell and Nathaniel Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovett et al v. Fuller et al
as 5:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Wayna Lovett and Maxine Schmidt
Defendant:
United Specialty Insurance Company, Bulldog Freightway Inc and James Edward Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Hicks
as 21-5004
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD HICKS, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rose v. Santini, et al
as 20-1446
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. SANTINI, A. OSAGIE, Physician Asst. and DR. D. OBA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
