Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Akers v. Flannigan et al
as 5:2017cv03094
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Kim I. Flannigan, Katherine Siereveld, Eric F. Melgren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Akers v. Shute, et al
as 11-3112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL SHUTE, U.S. Marshal Supervisor, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, U.S. Marshal Deputy, KIM I. MARTIN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, AKA Kim M. Berger, AKA Kim M. Fowler and others
Akers v. Keszei
as 10-4067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES KESZEI
Akers v. Keszei
as 2:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
James Keszei
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Keszei, et al
as 09-3062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES KESZEI, Federal Bureau of Investigation, KIM ILENE MARTIN, Office of U.S. Attorney, DONALD J. MIXAN, JR., Informant, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Akers v. Keszei et al
as 5:2009cv03032
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
James Keszei, Kim I Martin, Donald J. Mixan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Akers v. Warden of the Federal Transfer Center et al
as 5:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Montgomery C Akers
Defendant:
Warden of the Federal Transfer Center, Aldridge, Captain Reich and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Akers v. Vratil et al
as 5:2008cv03271
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Kathryn H Vratil, Kim I Martin, Michael Shute and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Akers v. Wiley, et al
as 08-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. WILEY, G. B. CHURCH, WENDY HEIM and others
Akers v. Wiley et al
as 1:2008cv00723
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
R. Wiley, G. B. Church, Wendy Heim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
