Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Hernandez-Romero v. Garland
as 24-9535
Petitioner:
JOSE DANIEL HERNANDEZ-ROMERO
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General
Alaniz-Hernandez v. USA
as 6:2021cv01222
Petitioner:
Jose Alaniz-Hernandez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States v. Hernandez-Calvillo
as 19-3210
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE FELIPE HERNANDEZ-CALVILLO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hernandez Rosales v. Barr
as 19-9564
Petitioner:
JOSE DEL HERNANDEZ ROSALES
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General
United States v. Hernandez-Velasco
as 19-6012
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-VELASCO
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Aguilar et al v. Management & Training Corporation
as 2:2016cv00050
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation
Plaintiff:
Marisela Aguilar , Miguel Blanco , Francisco J Carranza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Countess, et al
as 15-3300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
KEITH L. COUNTESS, PLASTER MASTERS, LC, MARCOS LANE STUBBS and others
United States v. Hernandez-Martinez
as 15-1312
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS HERNANDEZ-MARTINEZ
Barrientos-Hernandez v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00936
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Jose Barrientos-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Hernandez v. Ridley, et al
as 12-6188
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSE L. HERNANDEZ, as Special Administrator of the Estates of Jose L. Hernandez, Jr., deceased, and Salvador Hernandez, deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
GARY RIDLEY and TAYLOR HENDERSON
Defendant-Cross-Claimant:
DUIT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.
Defendant:
GEORGE RAYMOND, MATTHEW ROMERO, SHAWN DAVIS and others
Defendant Cross-Defendant:
ETHEL COOPER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
