Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estep v. Del City City of et al
as 5:2017cv00625
Plaintiff:
Royce Leon Estep
Defendant:
Del City City of , James Taylor and Ryan Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Schultz et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Lahoma Schultz , Rose Shoemaker , Tiffany Tuggle-Rogers and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Inc , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rounds et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv00330
Plaintiff:
Nicolette D Rounds
Defendant:
James Taylor, Jack Hildner, Dennis Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv00369
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
James Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rounds et al v. Taylor et al
as 2:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen E Rounds and Nicolette D Rounds
Defendant:
James Taylor , Jack Hildner and Dennis Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rounds v. Lewis et al
as 2:2010mc00120
Petitioner:
Stephen E Rounds
Respondent:
Dennis Lewis, James Taylor and Riverton Memorial Hospital
Taylor v. Pierson, et al
as 08-5030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARCHIE JAMES TAYLOR, Administrator of the Estate of Keenan Trevon Taylor
Defendant - Appellant:
MELISSA PIERSON and LESLIE A. BEYER
Defendant:
GRANVILLE L. HAYNES, II, BILLIE J. MAYBERRY and OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, State of Oklahoma (ex rel)
Taylor v. Oklahoma Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Archie James Taylor
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Granville L Haynes, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
