Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Rivers v. Erickson et al
as 1:2023cv03233
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.
Defendant:
Rachael Erickson, Rachael (I) Erickson, Polly Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivers v. State of Colorado, et al
as 23-1279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BERNARD KENNETH RIVERS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO, RACHEL ERICKSON, in her officialand individual capacity, MARCI HOFFMAN, in her official and individual capacity and others
Rivers v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Colorado, Rachael Erickson, Rachael (I) Erickson and others
Rivers-El v. Taylor
as 1:2018cv02596
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.El and Bernard Kenneth Rivers-El, Jr.
Defendant:
Todd Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers, Jr.-El v. Nichols et al
as 1:2018cv00858
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.-El
Defendant:
Dana Nichols, Dana (I) Nichols, Elizabeth Hardman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Brohl
as 1:2015cv00947
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.-El
Defendant:
Barbara Brohl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers, et al v. State Of Colorado, et al
as 14-1310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD KENNETH RIVERS, JR. and TRACI DAWN HAMILTON-RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF COLORADO and CITY OF GREELEY
Rivers, Jr v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2014cv01899
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers, Jr.-El and Traci Dawn Hamilton-Rivers
Defendant:
State of Colorado and City of Greeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. State of Colorado
as 1:2012cv02179
Plaintiff:
Bernard Kenneth Rivers , Jr.
Defendant:
State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rivers, Jr. v. Hartmann
as 12-1147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERNARD KENNETH RIVERS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES HARTMANN, Judge, 19th Judicial Court, Weld County, Colorado
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
