Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
In re: Norton
as 23-4037
Petitioner:
LONNIE NORTON
Respondent:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Norton v. Parsons, et al
as 23-4006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARSONS, DANNY WHITE, F. MCNIELL and others
Norton v. Coles, et al
as 23-4004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LONNIE NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU COLES, FNU ALLRED, FNU LEMMON and others
Norton v. Cooly et al
as 4:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
FNU Cooly and FNU Bergener
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Parsons et al
as 4:2020cv00038
Defendant:
Danny White, F. Mchiell, Michael Parsons and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Coles et al
as 4:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Timothy Dennis, Maryann Reding, Riley Duncan and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Coles et al
as 4:2018cv00095
Defendant:
Timothy Dennis, Maryann Reding, FNU Lemmon and others
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Salt Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2015cv00175
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
Salt Lake County Jail, Salt Lake County, James Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Unified Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00886
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Norton
Defendant:
Unified Police Department, Brian Loerke, Shawn Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
