Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Bagnell v. Culver et al
as 4:2017cv00107
Plaintiff: Nathan Daniel Bagnell
Defendant: Bill Culver and Becky Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagnell v. Floyd et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00049
Plaintiff: Nathan Daniel Bagnell
Defendant: Sheriff Floyd and Theresa Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knuth v. Schrader We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00816
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Knuth
Respondent: Jeff Schrader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knuth v. Mink We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00559
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Knuth
Respondent: Ted Mink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knuth v. Arp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00025
Plaintiff: Nathan Daniel Knuth
Defendant: Randall C. Arp, Rick Raemisch, Brandon Shaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castorena v. Kansas Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv03144
Petitioner: Nathan Daniel Castorena
Respondent: Kansas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $295,062.71 et al
as 1:2012cv01076
Defendant: Funds in the Amount of $295,062.71, Funds in the Amount of $294.02, Funds in the Amount of $38,129.93 and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Ira N. Stockton, Charles Hawes, Dawg House Distribution and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Shawnee Milling Company v. Drake et al
as 5:2010cv00002
Plaintiff: Shawnee Milling Company
Defendant: Nathan Daniel Drake and Halley & Talbot Law Firm The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States v. Larson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1465
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: NATHAN DANIEL LARSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?