Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Archuleta (PS) v. Kelly
as 1:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
Robert A Archuleta
Defendant:
Janette Pratt Kelly and No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pratt v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00388
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jatarvis Mandez Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
MRG v. Toussaint et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Meleaha Glapion-Pressley and MRG
Defendant:
Don Toussaint, Echo Ryan, Charles Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation v. Pratt
as 1:2022cv02990
Plaintiff:
Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Ashley Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Moccaldi v. Pratt City Ford, LLC
as 6:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Patrick Moccaldi
Defendant:
Pratt City Ford, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Pratt et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 1:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Jon Pratt and Lois Pratt
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
McVey v. Purvis et al
as 5:2022cv03040
Plaintiff:
Larry McVey
Defendant:
Andrea Purvis, Charleton F. Huen, Grant Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QBE Insurance Corporation v. Pratt & Whitney et al
as 1:2021cv03441
Plaintiff:
QBE Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney and Standard Aero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
