Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Prichard v. Mullet et al
as 5:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Jim Mullet, James Richardson, Garvin County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prichard v. Montgomery et al
as 5:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Ronald Montgomery and Devane Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prichard v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01177
Plaintiff:
Angela Prichard
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Wanton v. Prichard et al
as 1:2016cv01136
Plaintiff:
Raul Wanton
Defendant:
Troy Wayne Prichard, Raul A. Lopez and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holden v. KOAA TV Channel 5 & 30 et al
as 1:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Levi Holden
Defendant:
KOAA TV Channel 5 & 30, Cordillera Communications, Inc., Evening Post Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2252
Type:
Other Statutes
Prichard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv02569
Plaintiff:
David Prichard
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Aragon v. Prichard
as 1:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Aragon
Defendant:
Troy W. Prichard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steinmetz v. State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bryan James Steinmetz
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office , Hugh Dangler , T. David Eisenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lincoln Benefit Life Company v. Lamb et al
as 1:2010cv02394
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Benefit Life Company
Defendant:
Daniel Lamb, Ruble D. Lamb and David Prichard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Xango v. Citron et al
as 2:2009cv00642
Plaintiff:
Xango and Xango
Defendant:
Corey Citron, Corey Citron, Corey Citron and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
