Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Dawson (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv00573
Petitioner:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 21-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF ARCHAMBEAU, the CEO of Colorado Health Partners, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 20-1451
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, T. SICOTTE, C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
In re: Dawson
as 19-1412
Respondent:
C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections, D. HIBBS and others
Petitioner:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Dawson v. Lengerich et al
as 1:2018cv01112
Defendant:
Jason Lengerich, Coleman, David Lisac and others
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Lloyd, et al
as 15-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MEREDITH LLOYD and ELOISE OLIVERAS
Dawson v. Coffman
as 15-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CYNTHIA COFFMAN
Dawson v. Colorado
as 15-1287
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
COLORADO
Dawson v. Colorado
as 15-1287
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
COLORADO
Dawson v. Brightwell, et al
as 15-1103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD BRIGHTWELL, PAUL AUDET and ANGEL MEDINA
Defendant:
SUSAN AUDET, a/k/a Deanne Audet, DINO WILLIAMS, STEVEN OWENS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
