Cases 1 - 10 of 49
GS Holistic, LLC v. Strange Clouds Vape Pipe and Tobacco LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01699
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
STRANGE CLOUDS VAPE PIPE AND TOBACCO LLC, Joseph Sawaged and Strange Clouds Vape Pipe and Tobacco LLC doing business as Strange Clouds Vape
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Strange v. Johnston et al
as 1:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Ms. Brenda Michelle Strange and Brenda Michelle Strange
Defendant:
Andrew Johnston and Endeavor Business Media, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Strange v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Robert Joe Strange
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strange v. Wholesale Payments Direct Inc
as 2:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
Wholesale Payments Direct Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davis (ID 93293) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2022cv03153
Plaintiff:
David John Davis
Defendant:
Dan Schnurr, Robert Vieyra, (fnu) Collins and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. G My Business LLC
as 0:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
G My Business LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Strange v. Bright Heights Enterprises
as 2:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
Bright Heights Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Strange v. National Opinion Research Center
as 1:2021cv03122
Plaintiff:
Clinton Strange
Defendant:
National Opinion Research Center
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Strange v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2021cv01097
Petitioner:
Robert Joe Strange
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
