Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
State of Kansas, et al v. Garland, et al
as 24-3101
Plaintiff: STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, in his official capacity as the United States Attorney General and STEVEN M. DETTELBACH, in his official capacity as the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF OHIO
State of Alaska, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 24-3094
Plaintiff: STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity, MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Amicus Curiae: CATO INSTITUTE, MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY and NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE
State of Kansas, et al v. Biden, et al
as 24-3093
Plaintiff: STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Defendant: MIGUEL CARDONA, United States Secretary of Education, in his official capacity, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States of America, in his official capacity
Petitioner: CATO INSTITUTE, NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE and MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY
Montana, State of et al vs. Biden et al.
as 6:2024cv01141
Defendant: Julie A. Su, Thomas J. Vilsack, Department of Education and others
Plaintiff: State of Nebraska, State of South Carolina, State of South Dakota and others
Petitioner: State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Oklahoma v. HHS, et al
as 24-6063
Plaintiff: STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SECRETARY OF, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official Capacity as the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, JESSICA S. MARCELLA, in her official capacity as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF ALASKA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Rhame v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2023cv01113
Plaintiff: Liza Rhame
Defendant: State of Colorado, SE CDOC Parole-Op, El Paso County, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
303 Creative, et al v. Elenis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1413
Defendant / Appellee: ANTHONY ARAGON, HEIDI HESS, MIGUEL RENE ELIAS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LORIE SMITH and 303 CREATIVE LLC, a limited liability company
Petitioner: FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW
Amicus Curiae: CATO INSTITUTE, CENTER FOR RELIGIOUS EXPRESSION, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
Bradford, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-1023
Plaintiff / Appellant: DUKE BRADFORD, ARKANSAS VALLEY ADVENTURES, LLC, AKA AVA Rafting and Zipline and COLORADO RIVER OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the United States and others
Amicus Curiae: ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT, NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER and others
Petitioner: SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL
McFadden-Rhame v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2021cv00228
Defendant: State of Colorado, El Paso County, State of Montana: Powell County and others
Plaintiff: Liza McFadden-Rhame
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Wyoming, et al v. DOI, et al
as 20-8072
Intervenor: SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WILDERNESS SOCIETY and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as United States Department of Interior Secretary, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Petitioner: STATE OF WYOMING, STATE OF MONTANA, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE and others
Intervenor / Appellee: STATE OF TEXAS and STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?