Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Vasquez v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Robert Vasquez
Defendant:
GEO Group, Inc. and New Mexico Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Estacado Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Bryce Franklin
Defendant:
Estacado Federal Credit Union, The GEO Group, Inc., Mark Roddenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, D. C. Cole, Christine Topping and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1192
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Runnels v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Savortae Runnels
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Emily Timms, FNU Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsosie v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Evander Tsosie
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Ruben Quintana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility, et al
as 24-2037
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN W. FAWLEY
Defendant:
LEA COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, GEO GROUP, INC., R.C. SMITH, former Warden, L.C.C.F. and others
Plater v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Christine Topping and FNU Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jared M Trotter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
