Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Genesis Alkali LLC v. United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 13214
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff: Genesis Alkali LLC
Defendant: United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 13214
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining LLC v. United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 11-574
as 2:2022cv00254
Defendant: HollyFrontier Cheyenne Refining LLC and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 11-574
Counter Claimant: United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union Local 11-574
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel, Paper and Forest v. Tata Chemicals
as 19-8020
Defendant / Appellee: TATA CHEMICALS (SODA ASH) PARTNERS
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, ALF-CIO-CLC
NLRB v. Orchids Paper Products Company
as 19-9503
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Intervenor: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC
Respondent: ORCHIDS PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC v. Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff: United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO CLC
Defendant: Tata Chemicals (Soda Ash) Partners
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forest v. Phillips 66 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-5119
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION AND ITS LOCAL 13-857
Defendant - Appellant: PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, a foreign corporation
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and its Local 13-857 v. Phillips 66 Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00086
Plaintiff: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and its Local 13-857
Defendant: Phillips 66 Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO et al v. Norris
as 4:2013cv00645
Plaintiff: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO and USW, L. 4430
Defendant: Norris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Suncor Energy (U.S.A.), Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-1344
Plaintiff - Appellant: SUNCOR ENERGY (U.S.A.), INC.
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and USW LOCAL UNION 12-477
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union et al v. Weir Minerals Linatex
as 2:2011cv00509
Plaintiff: United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union and USW Local Union 12-593
Defendant: Weir Minerals Linatex
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?